Dangerous Midori

marielikestodraw:

sketchlock:

THE SEALVENGERS.

I’ve been meaning to do this for a while, but Marie having a bad day was a good sign to kick this into gear. Technically I was going to dedicate it to you anyway Marie. XDD Though the idea was suggested to me by my dear friend emperorcaligulove in school a few months or so ago.

OH MY FUCKIN GOD THANK YOU THIS IS AMAZING. OMG. I CANT EVEN. I… WOW.
I love this. I LOVE THIS. fcgihnjbvcfugophbvcfuigohp.

While watching Iron Man 2:
Friend: Oh my god, Tony Stark is an asshole.
Me: ...
Friend: What
Me: Um, yes, he is an asshole. Because he doesn't know how else to be. No-one ever taught him another way to live. Because he is AN AMAZING PERSON AND A HERO AND HE ATTACKED THE GUY JUST NOW WITHOUT ANY ARMOUR BECAUSE HE'S A SELF-SACRIFICING ASSHOLE-
Friend: Okay, yeah, that was heroic, but-
Me: -AND HE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO EXPRESS HIMSELF AND HE'S SO FUCKING LONELY AND HE VALUES EVERYONE ELSE'S LIVES ABOVE HIS OWN AND-
Friend: Fucking hell, okay, jeez-
Me: -SO YES HE IS AN ASSHOLE BUT HE IS TONY STARK HE IS A HERO AND ONE OF THE MOST AMAZING FICTIONAL CHARACTERS YOU WILL EVER SEE AND OH MY GOD, STEVE-
Friend: Okay, who the FUCK is Steve, you keep going on about hi-
Me: DON'T GET ME STARTED. FUCK YOU. FUCK MY FEELINGS AND FUCK YOU.
occupyallstreets:

CISPA Replaces SOPA As Internet’s Enemy No. 1 (Must Read)
The Internet has a new enemy. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA), also known as H.R. 3523, is a “cybersecurity” bill in the House of Representatives. While CISPA does not focus primarily on intellectual property (though that’s in there, too), critics say the problems with the bill run just as deep. 
As with SOPA and PIPA, the first main concern about CISPA is its “broad language,” which critics fear allows the legislation to be interpreted in ways that could infringe on our civil liberties. The Center for Democracy and Technology sums up the problems with CISPA this way:

    •    The bill has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies notwithstanding privacy and other laws;    •    The bill is likely to lead to expansion of the government’s role in the monitoring of private communications as a result of this sharing;    •    It is likely to shift control of government cybersecurity efforts from civilian agencies to the military;    •    Once the information is shared with the government, it wouldn’t have to be used for cybesecurity, but could instead be used for any purpose that is not specifically prohibited.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) adds that CISPA’s definition of “cybersecurity” is so broad that “it leaves the door open to censor any speech that a company believes would ‘degrade the network.’”
Moreover, the inclusion of “intellectual property” means that companies and the government would have “new powers to monitor and censor communications for copyright infringement.”
Furthermore, critics warn that CISPA gives private companies the ability to collect and share information about their customers or users with immunity — meaning we cannot sue them for doing so, and they cannot be charged with any crimes.
According to the EFF, CISPA “effectively creates a ‘cybersecurity’ exemption to all existing laws.”

“There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes.’” the EFF continues.
“That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT&T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.”

Read the full text of CISPA here, or the full official summary at the bottom of this page.
Read More

occupyallstreets:

CISPA Replaces SOPA As Internet’s Enemy No. 1 (Must Read)

The Internet has a new enemy. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA), also known as H.R. 3523, is a “cybersecurity” bill in the House of Representatives. While CISPA does not focus primarily on intellectual property (though that’s in there, too), critics say the problems with the bill run just as deep. 

As with SOPA and PIPA, the first main concern about CISPA is its “broad language,” which critics fear allows the legislation to be interpreted in ways that could infringe on our civil liberties. The Center for Democracy and Technology sums up the problems with CISPA this way:

    •    The bill has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies notwithstanding privacy and other laws;
    •    The bill is likely to lead to expansion of the government’s role in the monitoring of private communications as a result of this sharing;
    •    It is likely to shift control of government cybersecurity efforts from civilian agencies to the military;
    •    Once the information is shared with the government, it wouldn’t have to be used for cybesecurity, but could instead be used for any purpose that is not specifically prohibited.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) adds that CISPA’s definition of “cybersecurity” is so broad that “it leaves the door open to censor any speech that a company believes would ‘degrade the network.’”

Moreover, the inclusion of “intellectual property” means that companies and the government would have “new powers to monitor and censor communications for copyright infringement.

Furthermore, critics warn that CISPA gives private companies the ability to collect and share information about their customers or users with immunity — meaning we cannot sue them for doing so, and they cannot be charged with any crimes.

According to the EFF, CISPA “effectively creates a ‘cybersecurity’ exemption to all existing laws.”

There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes.’” the EFF continues.

That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT&T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.

Read the full text of CISPA here, or the full official summary at the bottom of this page.

Read More

shinkonokokoro:

wishurn:

pinkyapplez:

zappyzpace:

the-glint-off-her-spectacles:

thebritishteapot:

seductionofdeduction:

triggeringmywit:

weepingangelcastiel:

talesofamagicallife:

i-have-been-johnlocked:

hitler-in-the-cupboard:

SHERLOCKIANS !
Stop whatever you are doing right now because this is the most AMAZING Sherlock fan video that has ever been made!
JUST CLICK.

HOLY SHIT…….

image

image

image

HOLY FRAK! HOLY FRAK! OH MY GOD!!!!! :O

For the first half of the video i was like this:

but then everything changed half-way, and by the end i was just like:

WATCH IT PEOPLE!!! It will BLOW YOUR MIND!

i cant even….

HOLY FUCKING SHIT FUCK MOTHER OF MOTHERFUCKING GODTISS THIS IS AMAZING MIND BLOWN I CAN’T EVEN NJSFHBNKHBNSKJDGHBSKJJZKGNSDKLGS.

I want Sherlock as fairy imaginary friend too

At first I was like

And then I was like

Why can’t this be a real thing??? OMG I WANT IT

This is probably the most epic thing ever…
 

REBLOGGING AGAIN BECAUSE I WOULD WATCH THE FECK OUT OF THIS MOVIE.

the-absolute-funniest-posts:

Follow this blog, you will love it on your dashboard

AU: Wholock - Amelia Pond is head of an organisation called Torchwood. Recruiting the Doctor and Sherlock Holmes to help fight against the Silence.

—-

Amy: You’ll want to come with us, Mr. Holmes. Here, put this on.

Sherlock: An eye-patch? What would I need an eye-patch for?

Amy: It’s not an eye-patch.